Skip to content

SolutionsFor innovation labs

Governed explorationat enterprise scale.

Corporate labs need speed and a clear record. LiteSurface pairs structured discovery with budgets, provider controls, versioned prompts, and a decision trail your stakeholders can inspect, then carries the winner to a pilot app inside the same controls.

  • Workspace budgets and provider breakers
  • Prompt versions with rollback
  • Audit log across projects

The situation

Exploration is easy to startand hard to account for.

Labs are asked to find new growth while answering to risk, legal, and finance. AI tools promise speed, but few can show what they sent where, what it cost, or why a recommendation changed.

  • Spend without a ledger

    Model usage spreads across teams and personal accounts, with no budget that actually stops a run before it overspends.

  • Opaque recommendations

    Sponsors cannot see which evidence, prompt, or model produced a score, so they discount it or ask for a manual rewrite.

  • Controls bolted on late

    Governance arrives after the pilot, slowing down the teams it was meant to protect and forcing work to be redone.

  • Pilots that leave the guardrails

    The moment a concept becomes a prototype, the work moves to other tools and personal accounts, and spend, access, and history stop being recorded.

The workflow

Exploration withthe controls built in.

Policy comes first, so every run afterwards happens inside it, from the first research run to the pilot sponsors click through.

  1. Step 01

    Set policy first

    Admins choose which providers a workspace may use, set budgets that stop runs when spent, and review the active prompt versions before the first run.

    Governance
  2. Step 02

    Map your capabilities

    Build an atlas around your platforms and partners, with availability and freshness tracked, so concepts rely only on what you can actually use.

    Capability Atlas
  3. Step 03

    Evaluate with provenance

    Every score records its evaluators, prompt versions, cited claims, and gate results. Confidence and disagreement are reported separately.

    Evaluation
  4. Step 04

    Report to sponsors

    Portfolio decisions carry rationale and history. Validation briefs and PRDs give sponsors a readable summary with footnoted citations.

    Portfolio
  5. Step 05

    Build the pilot

    The Builder builds against confirmed screens in a sandbox. Each request has a spend cap, workspace budgets cover all model spend, and the agent sees variable names, never values.

    Builder
  6. Step 06

    Show a working pilot

    Deploy a preview with its own Postgres database at a shareable URL. Unclaimed previews are torn down automatically; the code can go to a repository you connect.

    Ship

What matters most

The parts labsare asked about first.

Example

A pilot the risk team can sign off on

An innovation lab at a financial services company wants to explore customer-facing tools built on new mobile capabilities, within a fixed quarterly model budget.

An illustrative scenario, not a customer story. Names and numbers are invented to show how the workflow behaves.

  1. Setup

    An admin sets the allowed providers, a monthly budget, and project exclusions for regulated advice. The active prompt versions are reviewed.

  2. Discovery

    Research and concept generation run across three projects. One concept fails the legal and safety gate and is set aside with its rationale.

  3. Mid-quarter

    A provider outage opens a circuit breaker. Evaluation continues in single-evaluator mode, and each affected result is flagged as partial.

  4. Quarter review

    Sponsors review the portfolio, the usage ledger, and the audit log. Two concepts move to validation with experiments and kill criteria.

  5. Next quarter

    The concept whose experiments held gets screens in Mockup Studio and a pilot in the Builder, under the same budget. Sponsors try it on a deploy preview with test data.

Portfolio

Illustrative data
  • 77 out of 100Savings goal nudgesStrong bandValidate
  • 74 out of 100Receipt capture for expensesStrong bandValidate
  • 62 out of 100Card controls widgetHold bandHold
  • 68 out of 100Automated credit adviceBlocked by a hard gateGate failed
Portfolio for one of the three projects. A failed hard gate overrides the score.

The result

The lab moves at the pace of a startup team. The quarterly review answers what was spent, what was sent to which provider, and why each concept landed where it did, and the pilot was built under the same budget.

In the project at the end

  1. Provider policy and budgets
  2. Three evaluated projects
  3. Decision record
  4. Screens and specs
  5. Pilot app
  6. Deploy preview

Which plan fits

Start with Enterprise.Change plans as you grow.

Enterprise adds single-tenant or self-hosted deployment, custom scorecard templates, managed provider keys, and a security questionnaire and DPA, on an annual agreement. SSO and SCIM are planned.

  • Solo

    Free

    during early access

    One workspace, unlimited projects, idea to app.

    • 400 image credits a month
    • 60 build minutes a month
    • No deploy previews
  • Team

    Free

    during early access

    Shared workspaces, roles, and the admin console.

    • 4,000 image credits a month
    • 600 build minutes a month
    • Deploy previews
  • EnterpriseBest fit

    Custom

    annual agreement

    Dedicated deployment, managed keys, and procurement support.

    • 20,000 image credits a month
    • 3,000 build minutes a month
    • Deploy previews

A lab can begin with a Team pilot in one workspace and move to Enterprise once the deployment model is agreed.

Explore faster,with the controls already in place.

Tell us about your deployment, identity, and review requirements, and we will shape an Enterprise agreement around them.

  • Solo and Team are free during early access
  • Explore a sample project first
  • Bring your own OpenAI and Anthropic keys